fix(agent-ratio): 에이전트 정산 비율 수정 충돌 처리를 안정화한다

This commit is contained in:
2026-04-11 21:40:45 +09:00
parent 88ffaf6d04
commit 08ba6a6046
3 changed files with 80 additions and 18 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
# 에이전트 정산 비율 수정 오류 대응 계획
- [x] 에이전트 정산 비율 수정 API/서비스/엔티티/리포지토리 흐름을 확인한다.
- [x] `Duplicate entry '2-1' for key 'agent_settlement_ratio.uk_agent_settlement_ratio_member_active'` 발생 조건과 현재 활성 비율 갱신 방식의 충돌 지점을 확인한다.
- [x] 실패를 재현하는 테스트를 먼저 추가하고, 테스트가 의도한 이유로 실패하는지 확인한다.
- [x] 기존 활성 비율을 안전하게 종료한 뒤 새 비율을 저장하도록 최소 범위로 수정한다.
- [x] 관련 테스트와 필요한 검증 명령을 실행하고 결과를 문서 하단에 누적 기록한다.
## 검증 기록
- 1차 구현
- 무엇을: 에이전트 정산 비율 수정 시 기존 활성 row 종료를 먼저 flush하도록 바꾸고, active unique 제약 충돌 시 같은 세션 재조회 없이 비즈니스 예외로 변환하도록 수정했다.
- 왜: 기존 활성 row가 DB에 닫히기 전에 새 row insert가 먼저 flush되면 `uk_agent_settlement_ratio_member_active` 충돌이 발생하고, 그 뒤 같은 세션 재조회가 이어지면 Hibernate `null id` assertion이 연쇄로 발생할 수 있기 때문이다.
- 어떻게:
- `./gradlew test --tests kr.co.vividnext.sodalive.admin.partner.agent.ratio.AgentSettlementRatioServiceTest` → 실패, 수정 전 flush 순서 검증이 깨지고 예외 후 재조회 검증도 실패해 재현 확인.
- `./gradlew test --tests kr.co.vividnext.sodalive.admin.partner.agent.ratio.AgentSettlementRatioServiceTest` → 성공.
- `./gradlew test --tests kr.co.vividnext.sodalive.admin.partner.agent.ratio.AdminAgentSettlementRatioControllerTest` → 성공.
- `./gradlew test --tests "kr.co.vividnext.sodalive.admin.partner.agent.ratio.*"` → 성공.
- `./gradlew ktlintCheck` → 성공.

View File

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ class AdminAgentSettlementRatioService(
val ratio = request.toEntity() val ratio = request.toEntity()
ratio.member = agent ratio.member = agent
saveRatioOrThrow(request, ratio) saveRatioOrThrow(ratio)
} }
@Transactional @Transactional
@@ -39,11 +39,11 @@ class AdminAgentSettlementRatioService(
?: throw SodaException(messageKey = "partner.agent.ratio.not_found") ?: throw SodaException(messageKey = "partner.agent.ratio.not_found")
validateNewEffectiveFrom(existing.effectiveFrom, request.effectiveFrom) validateNewEffectiveFrom(existing.effectiveFrom, request.effectiveFrom)
existing.close(request.effectiveFrom) existing.close(request.effectiveFrom)
repository.save(existing) repository.saveAndFlush(existing)
val ratio = request.toEntity() val ratio = request.toEntity()
ratio.member = agent ratio.member = agent
saveRatioOrThrow(request, ratio) saveRatioOrThrow(ratio)
} }
@Transactional(readOnly = true) @Transactional(readOnly = true)
@@ -95,16 +95,20 @@ class AdminAgentSettlementRatioService(
} }
} }
private fun saveRatioOrThrow( private fun saveRatioOrThrow(ratio: AgentSettlementRatio) {
request: CreateAgentSettlementRatioRequest,
ratio: AgentSettlementRatio
) {
try { try {
repository.saveAndFlush(ratio) repository.saveAndFlush(ratio)
} catch (e: DataIntegrityViolationException) { } catch (e: DataIntegrityViolationException) {
repository.findFirstByMemberIdAndEffectiveToIsNull(request.memberId) if (isActiveRatioConflict(e)) {
?: throw e throw SodaException(messageKey = "partner.agent.ratio.invalid_effective_from")
throw SodaException(messageKey = "partner.agent.ratio.invalid_effective_from") }
throw e
} }
} }
private fun isActiveRatioConflict(exception: Throwable): Boolean {
return generateSequence(exception) { it.cause }
.mapNotNull { it.message }
.any { it.contains("uk_agent_settlement_ratio_member_active") }
}
} }

View File

@@ -225,16 +225,15 @@ class AgentSettlementRatioServiceTest {
settlementRatio = 15, settlementRatio = 15,
effectiveFrom = LocalDateTime.of(2026, 4, 9, 10, 0) effectiveFrom = LocalDateTime.of(2026, 4, 9, 10, 0)
) )
val currentRatio = AgentSettlementRatio( val duplicateException = DataIntegrityViolationException(
settlementRatio = 12, "duplicate",
effectiveFrom = LocalDateTime.of(2026, 4, 9, 10, 0) RuntimeException("Duplicate entry '31-1' for key 'agent_settlement_ratio.uk_agent_settlement_ratio_member_active'")
) )
currentRatio.member = agent
Mockito.`when`(memberRepository.findByIdForUpdate(31L)).thenReturn(agent) Mockito.`when`(memberRepository.findByIdForUpdate(31L)).thenReturn(agent)
Mockito.`when`(repository.findFirstByMemberIdAndEffectiveToIsNull(31L)).thenReturn(null, currentRatio) Mockito.`when`(repository.findFirstByMemberIdAndEffectiveToIsNull(31L)).thenReturn(null)
Mockito.`when`(repository.saveAndFlush(Mockito.any(AgentSettlementRatio::class.java))) Mockito.`when`(repository.saveAndFlush(Mockito.any(AgentSettlementRatio::class.java)))
.thenThrow(DataIntegrityViolationException("duplicate")) .thenThrow(duplicateException)
val exception = assertThrows(SodaException::class.java) { val exception = assertThrows(SodaException::class.java) {
service.createAgentSettlementRatio(request) service.createAgentSettlementRatio(request)
@@ -286,7 +285,7 @@ class AgentSettlementRatioServiceTest {
} }
@Test @Test
@DisplayName("관리자는 기존 에이전트 정산 비율을 수정할 수 있") @DisplayName("관리자는 기존 활성 비율 종료를 먼저 flush한 뒤 새 에이전트 정산 비율을 수정 저장한")
fun shouldUpdateAgentSettlementRatio() { fun shouldUpdateAgentSettlementRatio() {
val agent = Member(password = "password", nickname = "agent", role = MemberRole.AGENT) val agent = Member(password = "password", nickname = "agent", role = MemberRole.AGENT)
agent.id = 31L agent.id = 31L
@@ -311,7 +310,7 @@ class AgentSettlementRatioServiceTest {
val ratioCaptor = ArgumentCaptor.forClass(AgentSettlementRatio::class.java) val ratioCaptor = ArgumentCaptor.forClass(AgentSettlementRatio::class.java)
val inOrder: InOrder = Mockito.inOrder(repository) val inOrder: InOrder = Mockito.inOrder(repository)
inOrder.verify(repository).save(existingRatio) inOrder.verify(repository).saveAndFlush(existingRatio)
inOrder.verify(repository).saveAndFlush(ratioCaptor.capture()) inOrder.verify(repository).saveAndFlush(ratioCaptor.capture())
assertEquals(agent, ratioCaptor.value.member) assertEquals(agent, ratioCaptor.value.member)
@@ -320,6 +319,46 @@ class AgentSettlementRatioServiceTest {
assertEquals(null, ratioCaptor.value.effectiveTo) assertEquals(null, ratioCaptor.value.effectiveTo)
} }
@Test
@DisplayName("정산 비율 수정 중 활성 unique 제약이 충돌하면 같은 세션 재조회 없이 잘못된 effectiveFrom 예외로 변환한다")
fun shouldThrowWithoutRequeryWhenUpdatingRatioViolatesActiveUniqueConstraint() {
val agent = Member(password = "password", nickname = "agent", role = MemberRole.AGENT)
agent.id = 31L
val existingRatio = AgentSettlementRatio(
settlementRatio = 10,
effectiveFrom = LocalDateTime.of(2026, 4, 1, 0, 0)
)
existingRatio.member = agent
val newEffectiveFrom = LocalDateTime.of(2026, 4, 9, 10, 0)
val request = CreateAgentSettlementRatioRequest(
memberId = 31L,
settlementRatio = 18,
effectiveFrom = newEffectiveFrom
)
val duplicateException = DataIntegrityViolationException(
"duplicate",
RuntimeException("Duplicate entry '31-1' for key 'agent_settlement_ratio.uk_agent_settlement_ratio_member_active'")
)
Mockito.`when`(memberRepository.findByIdForUpdate(31L)).thenReturn(agent)
Mockito.`when`(repository.findFirstByMemberIdAndEffectiveToIsNull(31L)).thenReturn(existingRatio)
Mockito.`when`(repository.saveAndFlush(Mockito.any(AgentSettlementRatio::class.java))).thenAnswer { invocation ->
val ratio = invocation.getArgument<AgentSettlementRatio>(0)
if (ratio === existingRatio) {
ratio
} else {
throw duplicateException
}
}
val exception = assertThrows(SodaException::class.java) {
service.updateAgentSettlementRatio(request)
}
assertEquals("partner.agent.ratio.invalid_effective_from", exception.messageKey)
Mockito.verify(repository, Mockito.times(1)).findFirstByMemberIdAndEffectiveToIsNull(31L)
}
@Test @Test
@DisplayName("기존 정산 비율이 없으면 수정할 수 없다") @DisplayName("기존 정산 비율이 없으면 수정할 수 없다")
fun shouldThrowWhenSettlementRatioDoesNotExist() { fun shouldThrowWhenSettlementRatioDoesNotExist() {